AN EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL
ORGANIZATIONS’ POPULATION-ENVIRONMENT CONNECTION

NAME OF ENVIRONMENTAL ORGANIZATION	POPULATION STABILIZATION POLICY STATEMENT (20 POINTS)	PERSONNEL TO IMPLEMENT POPULATION POLICY (20 POINTS)	RELEVANCE OF WEBSITE TO POPULATION POLICY (20 POINTS)	RELEVANCE OF MEMBER PUBLICATIONS TO POP POLICY (20 POINTS)	WORK WITH POPULATION STABILIZATION ORGANIZATIONS (20 POINTS)	TOTAL SCORE (MAX = 100%)	LETTER GRADE*
Defenders of Wildlife**	9	0	0	0	0	9%	F
Environmental Defense**	7	0	0	0	0	7%	F
Friends of the Earth**	0	0	0	0	0	0%	F
Greenpeace USA**	0	0	0	0	0	0%	F
Izaak Walton League of America***	15	13	5	9	6	48%	F
National Audubon Society***	12	16	15	6	6	55%	D+
National Wildlife Federation***	15	18	5	12	6	56%	D+
Natural Resources Defense Council**	0	0	0	0	0	0%	F
Nature Conservancy**	0	10	0	0	4	14%	F
Sierra Club***	10	18	15	0	6	49%	F
Wilderness Society**	15	0	0	0	2	17%	F
World Wildlife Fund**	5	5	0	0	0	10%	F

Click on the Underscored Listings above to learn more about those organizations. Return to Think Population-Environment Scorecard * <50=F, 50-54=D, 55-59=D+, 60-64=C-, 65-69=C, 70-74=C+, 75-79=B-, 80-84=B, 85-89=B+, 90-94=A-, 95-100=A ** Organization has received consistent Failing Grade since scoring began in April, 2001. *** Organization has received consistent Low Grade since scoring began in April, 2001. Detailed scoring will resume when Editor is notified organization has changed it's population policy. Updated: November 30, 2007